Skip to Main Content

Farai M. Shawa

Associate

F   610.667.7056

Farai Vyamucharo-Shawa, an associate of the Firm, concentrates his practice in the areas of securities litigation and corporate governance.

Farai graduated from the Temple University Beasley School of Law in 2021. While in law school, Farai worked as a legal intern with the Philadelphia Eagles and as a summer associate at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher and Flom LLP. Farai was also a member of the Temple Trial Team, ICC Moot Court Team and President of the International Law Society. Prior to joining the Firm, Farai practiced corporate litigation at a prominent defense firm in Wilmington, Delaware.

Memberships

  • Delaware Young Lawyers Section

Awards/Rankings

  • The International Academy of Trial Lawyers' Prize
Experience

Current Cases

  • This securities fraud class action arises out of defendants’ representations and omissions made regarding the demand for FMC’s suite of crop protection products during the COVID-19 pandemic and afterwards. As the realities of supply chain disruptions gripped the world, FMC’s distribution partners sought to purchase as much product as possible while it was available. Beginning in 2020 and stretching into 2022, FMC welcomed this boom in sales across all of its products, including its flagship diamide insecticides.

    While this practice of “pre-buying” was well known within the Company, investors were kept in the dark as to the reality of clients pre-emptively buying more product than what was needed for the growing season. At the same time, FMC was facing the reality of its diamide insecticides losing their patent protections and facing competition for generic versions of the same products, being sold at a fraction of the price. In spite of the knowledge that the demand for their products would eventually be crippled by customers stockpiling their products and generic competitors that would severely cut into sales of FMC’s flagship products, FMC sought to convince the public that the high sales numbers were a new normal with no signs of slowing down, and that generic competition was only a worry in the distant future.

    Plaintiffs allege defendants made repeated representations throughout the Class Period FMC was seeing robust demand for its products around the globe, and that there were no issues with the amount of inventory being held by its customers besides some transient weather issues that would soon be forgotten. Then on May 2, 2023, FMC announced to the public that it was lowering its growth expectations for the upcoming quarter, but still assured investors that there were no further issues to report. The same was true on July 10, 2023 when FMC again revised down its revenue and EBITDA outlooks for the year, still without disclosing the realities of its current demand environment. It wasn’t until Blue Orca Capital published a report on September 7, 2023, detailing the full inventories of FMC’s clients and the already real threat of generic products that were already legal in countries like China and India that FMC was forced to publicly grapple with the truth. Not until late October 2023 would FMC fully explain to investors that it expected the destocking of its clients’ warehouses to extend into the following year, and that its cratering sales numbers and cash flow had driven the Company to renegotiate its credit agreements and begin a full restructuring of its Brazilian operations, the Company’s single largest sales region for the past five years.

    On July 17, 2024, plaintiffs filed a 186-page complaint on behalf of a putative class of investors who purchased FMC common stock between February 9, 2022 and October 30, 2023, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Through the complaint, plaintiffs seek to recover damages suffered by investors in FMC during the Class Period. Defendants are scheduled to respond to the complaint on or before September 17, 2024.

  • Defendant Humana Inc. is an insurance and healthcare company that provides medical benefit plans to approximately 16.3 million people. This securities fraud class action arises out of Humana’s materially false or misleading statements concerning the profitability and quality of its core Medicare Advantage business, which generates the vast majority of the Company’s revenue. Medicare Advantage plans provide health insurance to seniors over the age of 65 and those under 65 with particular disabilities.

    On November 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a 215-page complaint on behalf of a putative class of investors alleging that Defendants Humana, its former Chief Executive Officer, Bruce D. Broussard, and current Chief Financial Officer, Susan Diamond, violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.

    As alleged in the Complaint, Humana reaped record profits during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic due to abnormally low use of healthcare services by the Company’s Medicare Advantage members. By mid-2022, investors were concerned that Humana would see heightened healthcare utilization, and therefore lower profits, as its Medicare Advantage members began seeking care that had been deferred during the pandemic. For Humana, member utilization and the associated cost of providing member benefits is the key measure of the Company’s profitability. During the Class Period, Defendants assured investors that the Company was continuing to experience favorable utilization trends in its Medicare Advantage business, and downplayed worries about future utilization increases. In addition, Defendants touted as a competitive advantage and revenue-driver Humana’s Star ratings—a quality measure assigned each year by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) that had historically resulted in billions of dollars in additional payments to Humana.

    However, unbeknownst to investors, as the effects of the pandemic abated, Defendants knew that the depressed utilization had created a massive backlog of healthcare needs, particularly elective surgical procedures. By the beginning of the Class Period in July 2022, Defendants knew that there was a surge of Medicare Advantage members seeking previously deferred care, which was significantly increasing the Company’s benefit expenses. Moreover, Defendants knew that the Company’s own internal analyses showed that Humana faced a significant downgrade in its Star ratings, jeopardizing billions in Medicare revenue.

    The Complaint alleges that Defendants actively concealed the Company’s increased Medicare Advantage utilization through improper denials of claims for medical services and aggressive prior authorization practices. At the same time, Defendants undertook a series of destructive cost-cutting measures and headcount reductions. These cost-cutting measures led to declines in the quality of Humana’s Medicare Advantage benefit plans, and ultimately, its Star ratings by hamstringing the departments responsible for ensuring that Humana’s members had access to high quality, accessible, and efficient healthcare.

    The truth regarding Humana’s increased utilization began to emerge in June 2023, causing a series of stock price declines in the latter half of 2023 and early 2024. Throughout this period, Defendants continued to tout the Company’s Star ratings and claimed that they could offset the Company’s increased utilization costs through further cost cuts. Then, in October 2024, the truth regarding the dramatic decline in Humana’s Medicare Advantage plans was revealed when the Company’s significantly degraded Star ratings were released by CMS, causing another precipitous drop in Humana’s stock price.

    Read Amended Class Action Complaint Here