The Gauzy Ltd. class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of those who purchased or otherwise acquired Gauzy Ltd. (“Gauzy”) (NASDAQ: GAUZ) securities between March 11, 2025 and November 13, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Captioned Bao Duong v. Gauzy Ltd., No. 25-cv-10179 (S.D.N.Y.), the Gauzy class action lawsuit alleges that Gauzy and/or certain of its officers and/or directors violated federal securities laws by making false or misleading statements and/or omitted to disclose material information.
If you suffered losses as a result of your Gauzy investment and want to find out more about this action and your rights, fill out the form on this page or contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. of KTMC by calling (484) 270-1453 or via e-mail at info@ktmc.com.
CASE BACKGROUND:
Gauzy develops, manufactures, and supplies vision and light control technology products internationally, with its French operations being a substantial portion of its revenue.
The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose that: (1) three of Gauzy’s French subsidiaries lacked the financial means to pay its debts as they were due; (2) the financial insufficiencies made it substantially likely that the company would face insolvency proceedings and the company could potentially trigger its existing senior secured debt facilities to go into default; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about the company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS:
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Gauzy securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Gauzy class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member’s claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. Filling out the online form above or communicating with any counsel is not necessary to participate or share in any recovery achieved in this case. Any member of the purported class may move the court to serve as a lead plaintiff through counsel of his/her choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an inactive class member.
ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP:
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (KTMC) is a leading U.S. plaintiff-side law firm focused on securities-fraud class actions and global investor protection. The firm represents individual investors as well as institutions, such as major pension funds, asset managers, and international investors. KTMC has led some of the largest recoveries in securities litigation and has been recognized by peers and the legal media with numerous accolades, including The National Law Journal’s Plaintiff’s Hot List and Trailblazers in Plaintiffs' Law, BTI Consulting Group’s Honor Roll of Most Feared Law Firms, The Legal Intelligencer’s Class Action Firm of the Year, Lawdragon’s Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers, and Law360’s Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar. The firm operates globally with offices in Pennsylvania and California. For more information about Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, please visit www.ktmc.com.